STEM education Are we prepared to this change in the educational system in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela?
Keywords:
STEM education; digital tools; teaching; studentsAbstract
Currently there is a wide range of digital tools that can be used in the teaching of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (the so-called STEM disciplines) during the development of schooling at the secondary and diversified levels. In this research work, based on the definitions proposed by framework documents of broad international consensus, the meeting points between STEM education and digital tools are discussed, and how an adequate symbiosis between the two can serve both to improve skills scientific, mathematical and technological skills of students who will enter the university educational system in the future, as well as to improve their digital skills necessary for personal and professional development in the digital age. The research aims to provide a perspective on the use of digital tools in the classroom that transcends the passing fads imposed by the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and that focuses on why and how to use each of these tools, and for this we focus on highlighting both the opportunities that digital teaching offers for STEM learning. A diagnosis will be made from a set of reflections and contributions from the documentary review developed in the research, it is intended to establish if the educational system in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is prepared to take on the challenges posed by STEM teaching. The researcher assumes a qualitative ethnographic methodological approach, where direct observation will be highlighted, the search for information and documentation, the personal experience of the researcher as a teacher will also be used.
Downloads
References
ABELL, S. y LEDERMAN, N. G. (2006). Handbook of research on science education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaium Associates.
AINSWORTH, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. Retrieved from Recuperado en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VFW-4JXPS4C-1/2/674d9e5ed47f7a90551606d4f2923ff9
ANANIADOU, K., y CLARO, M. (2008). 21st Century Skills and Competencies for New Millenium Learners in OECD. Edu/Wkp (2009)20.
BEAUCHAMP, G. (2016). Computing and ICT in the Primary School: From pedagogy to practice. Routledge.
BLIKSTEIN, P. (2013). Digital Fabrication and ’Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.
BOSCH, H. E., BERGERO, M. S., CARVAJAL, L., DI BLASI REGNER, M. A., GEROMINI, PELEN, M. (2011). Nuevo paradigma pedagógico para la enseñanza de ciencia matemática. Revista Avances en Ciencias e Ingeniería, Vol. 2 (3), pp. 131-144.
BRENNAN, K. y RESNICK, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–25). Vancouver.
COELLO, S., CRESPO, T., HIDALGO. J. y DÍAZ. D. (2008). El modelo STEM como recurso metodológico didáctico para construir el conocimiento científico critico de estudiantes de Física. Jounal Phyic Education. 12 (2). Recuperado en: http://ww.lajpe.org
COOK, M., WIEBE, E. N. y CARTER, G. (2008). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations. Science Education, 92(5), 848–867.Recuperado en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20262
DE FRUYT, F., WILLE, B. y JOHN, O. P. (2015). Employability in the 21st Century: Complex (Interactive) Problem Solving and Other Essential Skills. Industrial and Organisaztional Psychology, 8(2), 276–281. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.33
DIGITALES. (2019). El Desafío de las vocaciones STEM. Por qué los jóvenes españoles descartan los estudios de ciencia y tecnología. Recuperado en: http://Www.Digitales.Es
DOMÈNECH, X., LLORENTE, I., RUIZ, N., SERRA, C., ULLDEMOLINS, M., ARRIZABALAGA, A. y DOMÈNECH CASAL, J. (2016). XYZ-Stars i Solar System Pathway : Ciències : revista del professorat de ciències de primària i secundària, (31), 0021–0028. Retrieved from Recuperado de: http://ddd.uab.cat/record/159719
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2014). Measuring Digital Skills across the EU: EU wide indicators of Digital Competence.
EVAGOROU, M., JIMENEZ-ALEIXANDRE, M. P., y OSBORNE, J. (2012). “Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?” A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401–428. Recuperado en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211
FAULDER, T. R. (2011). Technology Integration: A Research-Based Professional Development Program.
FRIDBERG, M., THULIN, S. y REDFORS, A. (2017). Preschool children’s Collaborative Science Learning Scaffolded by Tablets. Research in Science Education. Recuperado en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9596-9
HERMANN, M., PENTEK, T., y OTTO, B. (2016). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3928–3937). IEEE. Recuperado en: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488
HILL, D. y ASSOCIATES (2013). Understanding Integrated STEM Education: Report on a National Study. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
HILL, S. y GRINNELL, C. (2014). Using digital storytelling with infographics in STEM professional writing pedagogy. In 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) (pp. 1–7). Pittsburgh, PA.
JIMOYIANNIS, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269.
LAVERDE, J. (2016). Diseño de un módulo didáctico con el enfoque STEM para la enseñanza/aprendizaje de los gases en la educación media. (Tesis de Maestria, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá). Recuperado de http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/view/subjects/37.html
LIU, S.-H. (2011).Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education.
LÓPEZ, V. y PINTÓ, R. (2017). Identifying secondary-school students’ difficulties when reading visual representations displayed in physics simulations. International Journal of Science Education, 39(19), 1353–1380. Recuperado en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1332441
MARQUÈS, P., y SARRAMONA, J. (2017). Competències bàsiques de l’àmbit digital.
MEDINA, A, V. (2020). Educación universitaria mediada por las TIC en el contexto de la pandemia COVID-19. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 25(2), 1-4..
MONFERRER, J. L. y FORCANO, A. (2014). El aprendizaje colaborativo y las TIC en clase de física. Alambique Didàctica de Las Ciencias Experimentales, 37–44.
NEUBERT, J. C., MAINERT, J., KRETZSCHMAR, A. y GREIFF, S. (2015). The Assessment of 21st Century Skills in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Complex and Collaborative Problem Solving. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 238–268. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.14
OSBORNE, J. y DILLON, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
PAPERT, S. (1999). What is Logo? And Who Needs It? In Logo Philosophy and Implementation (pp. IV–XVII).
PÉREZ, A. (2008). Una Nueva Forma De Planificación En El Aula: El Modelo T. Recuperado en: https://www.google.co.ve/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmartiniano.editorialconocimiento.cl%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F05%2Funa-nueva-forma-de-planificacion-en-el aula.doc&ei=9ufoVIb_FYyxsATJ_4KwAQ&usg=AFQjCNGhowVeadvFHTd_Uk96TVHwcr3NWg&bvm=bv.86475890,d.cWc [Consulta: Enero, 25 de 2015].
PINTÓ, R. (2009). Choosing ICT: a matter of learning about learning Science. In P. Kariotoglou, A. Spyrtou y A. Zoupidis (Eds.), Πρακτικά του ΣυνεδρίΩυ. Florin (Greece): School of education, University of Western Macedonia.
PROLONGO, M. y PINTO, G. (2019). La Educación STEM: Ejemplos Prácticos e Introducción al proyecto EuropeoScientix. Recuperado en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333718860
ROCARD, M.(2007). Science Education Now: A renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussels: Directorate General for Research, Science, Economy and Society.
ROMERO, M., QUESADA, A. (2014). Nuevas tecnologías y aprendizaje significativo de las ciencias. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias: Revista de Investigación Y Experiencias Didácticas, 32(1), 101–115.
SÁNCHEZ, I. (2018). Análisis de la Metodología STEM a través de la percepción docente. (Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Vallodolid, España). Recuperado en: http://www.uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/handle/10324/30952/TFMB.134.pdf;jsessionid=33BA67F247C843850DC7E88A6023D778?sequence=1
SANDERS, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68 (4), 20-26.
SCHNOTZ, W. (2004). An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning .
SHATREVICH, V., Y STRAUTMANE, V. (2015). Industrialisation factors in post-industrial society. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(2), 142–153.ç
STRAUB, E. T. (2009). Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. Recuperado en: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
TSAI, C., SHEN, P. y LIN, R. (2015). Exploring the Effects of Student-Centered Project-Based Learning with Initiation on Students’ Computing Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Digital Storytelling. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 11(1), 27–43. Recuperado en: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2015010102
VALENDUC, G. y VENDRAMIN, P. (2016). Work in the digital economy: sorting the old from the new.
VALKANOVA, Y. y WATTS, M. (2007). Digital story telling in a science classroom: reflective self‐learning (RSL) in action. Early Child Development and Care, 177(6–7), 793–807. Recuperado en: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430701437252
WING, J. (2006). Computational thinking. In Commun. ACM 49 (pp. 33–35).
ZAPATA-ROS, M. (2015). Pensamiento computacional: Una nueva alfabetización digital. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), (46).Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.6018/red/46/4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
